Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Senior Project Online Source - Due Wednesday February 1, 2012
Research Source
Log for Online Source
“Specific Page Title or Article Title”
Ex: “Twilight: A negative influence on teens or just
harmless fun?”
|
Classism: An Introduction
|
Primary Contributor to the Website (if given)
(author, editor, producer, etc)
Ex: POV
|
Joe Scanlan |
Title of the
Entire Website (not www. )
Ex:
CBC News
|
Red Flags: Classism: An Introduction
|
Publisher or Sponsoring Organization of the website
(if given)
Ex: CBC
|
Red Flags |
Date Page was Last Revised
Ex: 10 September
|
|
Date You Read It
Ex: 21 January
2012
|
8 February 2012
|
<URL address> (ALL of it)
|
FIVE FACTS FROM THE SOURCE (Embedded):
EX: The
article cites Maria Nikolajeva, a professor of at Cambridge, as saying that Bella
does not "in any way promote independent thinking or personal development" in
women, instead portraying a woman "meek and willing to do anything for her
vampire boyfriend" (POV).
|
Classism is a "distasteful to specialist today" due to the attitude in the nineteenth and early twentieth century towards other people. Joe Scanlan |
In this world classism is defined as a "distinction made between pop culture and fine art".
Joe Scanlan |
Classism is found to be a "structure of lies or myths" told by authors or other opinions from viewers about racism and sexism.
Joe Scanlan |
Many believe that classism is a "sign of theoretical power of the pop culture".
Joe Scanlan |
The pop culture is made up of a "created body of theory and practice" and that classism is not a fantasy of the pop culture.
Joe Scanlan |
Summary of Source (Three-Four Sentences of the Who, What, Where, Why, and How in your own words. NO OPINION):
Joe Scanlan believes that classism is made up of lies and myths and its what makes up the pop culture. Throughout america people discriminate over who is better because they define themselves as if they were a higher class than some else. this article shows that classism is a distinction of the pop culture.
Credibility of Source:
Author or Site: Who is the author? What training have they had? If there is no author, examine the site. What is the purpose of the site? Who funds the site?
The author is once again Joe Scanlan he just represents what the art of classism really is.
Attachment: Does the author or site have anything to gain from writing this, or is it simply informative? For example, is it a cigarette business posting an article about the benefit of cigarettes, or is it a scientific community unaffiliated with the cigarette business?
This information given by the speaker is informative and has a some what of personal opinions also.
Bias: Do you detect a bias (a favoring of either side) in the author's writing?
This author favors both sides he explains the negative about classism and not the positive but how classism is defined.
References: Does the author cite references in the writing? If so, do these add or take away from the credibility?
No this author does not cite any references he just explains classism in the pop culture.
Use of Source: How will you use this source in your project?
I will use this source to also support my opinion on how i think about classism.
No comments:
Post a Comment